My choice to specialize in the reconstituted stone over natural is a practical one, as well as one of philosophy. As is my choice to use mostly stabilized woods when I use wood. Bone and horn are something I like working with, but my access to them is limited, and I simply cannot afford ivory.
To explain my choice of stone:
The equipment I carve with is not "lapidary" equipment. It is a flexshaft with steel burrs. This means that if I try carving natural stone, I'm not only going to be putting myself in unnecessary danger from things like stone chips, I'm going to be burning thru burrs and wasting material and time. Recon stone takes fantastic detail, and a very nice finish. It's more wearable than natural stone. And it doesn't have cracks. It doesn't absorb skin oils and discolor. I don't make stuff to sit in display cases. I make things my customers won't want to take off. And it's affordable for me, which makes it affordable for my customers.
It's also much faster to carve. This leaves me more time to do things like design the knot I used for that first pendant from scratch. (Yes, I design knotwork.) If it takes me months to carve one piece, I don't have time to design, and my work is out of the price range of normal people...
About stabilized wood:
The stabilized wood I use has had acrylic resin forced into it under vacuum and pressure. The resin goes all the way thru the wood's fiber. This doesn't change the look of the wood, but it does make it TOTALLY waterproof. This means that my customer doesn't need to spend time oiling it. They can wear it kayaking. Or in the shower. It means that a pendant can become a companion and treasured item, not just interesting art. It can even become a symbol of that person's self. But wood jewelry can't do this if it cracks when it gets wet, or hot & dry. The other benefit is to the hardness. Stabilization makes the wood uniformly hard. This means that it uniformly takes detail. To me, with the tools I use, unstabilized wood is generally kinda "mushy". And it's not very durable. In 100 years, my work will still be in good shape, regardless of the conditions it's been kept in.
I'm not trying to make something that is valuable for it's materials alone. I'm trying to create pieces that will be treasured in a very personal way. I have actually refused to accept a commission from someone who just wanted a prop for a drama costume, to be used once and never worn again for any other reason. That's not what I'm about. I want my customer who buys a simple pendant to pass it on to their child when they come of age, and tell them it's brought them luck, or ask that it be buried with them. Unlike many carvers, I would refuse to sell if a museum wanted one of my pieces, unless they were willing to pay about ten times my normal rate, simply because that piece would never have a chance to be loved one-on-one. My few natural wood pieces, and all of my bone and horn pieces are things that aren't worn against the skin. Things that people are more careful with anyway.
As far as the "feel" of the work goes- I honestly challenge any of you to pick up my work and say that it feels like plastic. Corian and recon jet are both nicely substantial when touched. The jet feels no different from natural stone. I would honestly like to try clear acrylic, but I haven't had a chance. I believe however that I could achieve something that would make you disregard it's material when held. It's easy to judge whether it is "just plastic" when all you see is pictures and read that it is not natural stone, but to do so in person is not so easy.
Many of you should really investigate the materials and think about the fact that it's what you do with them that really determines value in the long run. I can make a crude unidentifiable object out of fine jade. It's still an ugly chunk of junk. It's expensive junk, but it has no artistic merit, no impact on the viewer until you tell them that it's worth something because it's jade. And the viewer will still see no beauty unless motivated by
greed.
Art should not be something that invokes greed. It should invoke a more subtle desire to directly and personally own it, to
touch it, to
possess it as you would a pet or even a lover. To call an object "
mine" in a way that denotes something lasting, not something monetary or transitory, not something you would be willing to trade away for another object. This is what I strive for as an artist. And this cannot me achieved by mere materials.
LJ
magnus homestead, on Jul 1 2008, 05:51 PM, said:
Hello and Welcome LI,
I for one find your work to be very wonderfilled - you are carving a spiritual path and it shows! I would like to see you carve more of the natural materials found all around us,
as I feel they have a better inherent presense and I just love the feel of wood, bone, horn and stone more than resins and plastics. But that being said, once again I want to say I love your work. Thank you so much for sharing these with us here.
Blessings,
Magnus